Without these three men, Harry Anslinger, William Randolph Hearst, and John D. Rockefeller, Jr., it is arguable that marijuana prohibition would have never happened.
When you look historically at marijuana prohibition in the United States, these three people stand above the rest in bearing responsibility for orchestrating this atrocity that continues to plague our country, and in fact the planet, to this day.
Of course these three men were not totally responsible. They had help from countless others, and more stood by in cohesion, ignorance and/or apathy and allowed it to happen.
Harry Anslinger
Harry Jacob Anslinger (May 20, 1892 – November 14, 1975) was a military man and railroad police officer before he held office as the assistant prohibition commissioner in the Bureau of (Alcohol) Prohibition.
When prohibition was repealed, the ambitious Anslinger found himself in need of job security. He found a convenient scapegoat in cannabis, now dubbed ”marihuana” in order to whip up a racist based fear frenzy against the Mexican immigrants coming over the border to work in agricultural jobs.
In the northeast, black jazz musicians bore the brunt of the racist anti-marijuana rants. Practically overnight America’s favorite cash crop, hemp, was transformed into “The Devil’s Weed.”
In 1930 a new division of the Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, was formed and Harry Anslinger was appointed its director.
Essentially the first “Drug Czar” Anslinger’s biased, racist, anti-weed agenda would wreak havoc through 5 Presidential administrations until he finally left the office in 1962. Anslinger then took his crusade global, serving for two years as the United States’ representative to the United Nations Narcotics Commission.
William Randolph Hearst
Anslinger found a powerful ally in his prohibitionist crusade in newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst as the men shared a hatred of Mexican immigrants.
Hearst’s lurid yellow journalism tales of marijuana crazed Mexicans going on murderous rampages sold lots of newspapers, but Hearst had an even bigger financial motivation. In fact many have speculated that marijuana prohibition actually had little to do with marijuana and everything to do with hemp.
When the civil war ended and slavery was abolished, hemp production became cost prohibitive due to the labor intensive processing it required. Hearst had heavily invested in the timber industry, a relatively safe bet at the time as hemp production was waning.
Then came the invention of the decorticator, a machine that made processing the fibrous plant easy and affordable and suddenly Hearst’s big investment was in jeopardy as hemp paper can be made cheaper, in less time, and with less environmental impact than logging.
John D Rockefeller, Jr.
Another magnate who stood to lose was Standard Oil Company’s John D. Rockefeller, Jr. who pretty much had a monopoly on the US petroleum market at the time.
Rockefeller was a big supporter of alcohol prohibition, in the beginning, arguably also for financial reasons – with alcohol illegal people were forced to run their cars on gasoline instead of the cheaper farm-made ethyl alcohol.
When the 22nd amendment repealed alcohol prohibition, Rockefeller faced similar competition from hemp.
Rudolph Diesel, inventor of the diesel engine, originally used hemp oil to fuel it. Rockefeller had a vested interest in keeping this environmentally friendly renewable resource out of the picture.
Many other industries stood to lose as well.
A 1938 edition of Popular Mechanics claimed that over 25,000 products could be made from hemp – everything from cellophane to dynamite. Henry Ford even made a car out of hemp fiber than was lighter and 10 times as strong as steel.
No matter, as history has shown, corporate greed won out and marijuana became illegal in this country.
These three men, in positions of great power in government, the media, and industry, used their influence to push forward an agenda that lead to the polluting of our planet, wars fought over oil, the loss of personal liberties, and the prison industrial complex.
